48+

Numeric Signals
at Inference

3+

Trained Model
Artifacts

120+

Sample Match Rows
(Synthetic Demo)

35+

Documented
CSV Columns

2/mo

Public Release
Cadence

section

Audited By the ML Community

Published on the two leading open ML platforms. Inspectable, downloadable, and versioned.

addweb-solution / la-liga-score-predictor

The home of open ML. Model card, evaluation summary, training artifacts, SHA256 verification, and full Python package distribution.

addwebsolutionpvtltd / la-liga-score-predictor

The home of competitive data science. Public dataset distribution, notebook integration, and discoverability across millions of data scientists worldwide.

section

Most Agencies Talk AI. We Ship It.

Every offshore development agency claims AI capability. Few have shipped a trained model anyone can audit. We built and open-sourced this La Liga Score Predictor for one reason: to make our ML capability verifiable, not just visible.

If a CTO wants to know whether AddWeb really does ML, they don’t have to take our word for it. They read the code, audit the model card, run the smoke test, inspect the SHA256 artifacts.

This is one model. We have built dozens. The rest live inside client production systems under NDA. This one is yours to inspect, fork, learn from, and use as proof of what we can build for you.

Inference Pipeline Architecture

Historical Match CSV

scores · Elo · tactics · player aggregates

Feature Builder

rolling form · 35-column normalization · fallback defaults

Calibration Layer

temperature scaling · abstain logic · score range

Predicted Score + Probabilities + Confidence

section
4+

Years

AI-Native Engineering

Production AI work since 2022. Not a pivot. Not a wrapper.

3+

Owned AI Products

AddWeb AI · EcomSupport360 · WeWP. Live in production today.

6+

Industries Shipped

FinTech · Healthcare · eCommerce · SaaS · Logistics · EdTech.

ISO

27001 Certified

Information security certified. NDA-first. Enterprise-grade.

section

What’s Actually Inside

Six engineering decisions that separate this from a wrapper around a public API. Each one matters when shipping ML to production.

01

Three-Model Ensemble

Predicting a football score is not one prediction. It’s three: how many goals home, how many goals away, and the outcome direction. We trained three independent CatBoost models and reconcile them through a calibrated decoder.

  • home_goals_model.cbm — regression on home goal expectation
  • away_goals_model.cbm — regression on away goal expectation
  • outcome_model.cbm — classification: home / draw / away

02

Calibrated Probabilities

Raw model probabilities lie. They overstate confidence. We apply temperature scaling to produce probabilities that reflect actual outcome frequencies — meaning a 60% confidence prediction is right roughly 60% of the time.

  • Pre-calibration probabilities preserved for diagnostics
  • Calibrated probabilities surfaced as primary output
  • Confidence margin computed between top two outcomes

03

Abstain Logic

Not every match is predictable. Tightly contested derbies, fragile tactical matchups, and historically volatile pairings produce ambiguous probabilities. The model knows when to flag a fixture as fragile rather than overcommit.

  • abstain_recommended: true when confidence is low
  • predicted_score_range returned for fragile matches
  • Specialist rule engine for known volatile patterns

04

Resilient Feature Builder

Real-world data is messy. The wrapper handles thin CSVs, missing optional columns, inconsistent team names, and partial player aggregates. Quality scales with data richness — but the package never breaks because of imperfect input.

  • Rolling features computed from historical rows
  • Fallback defaults when optional fields are missing
  • Stable team naming validation

05

Two-Tier Public API

Different consumers need different shapes. Front-end product cards need the simple response. Power users need the full debug payload. Both interfaces sit on the same model artifact.

  • predict_match() — full advanced response
  • predict_match_simple() — UI-friendly subset
  • predict_features() — raw feature interface

06

Production-Grade Packaging

This is not a notebook dumped on the internet. It is a real Python package — pyproject.toml, semantic versioning, SHA256-verified artifacts, model card, evaluation summary, FAQ, smoke test, batch inference, CLI demo, and notebook starter all included.

  • MIT licensed for unrestricted commercial use
  • Versioned (2026.04.1) with planned bi-monthly cadence
  • Cryptographic artifact verification via ARTIFACTS_SHA256.txt
section

The 48 Signals

No magic. Just disciplined feature engineering. Every signal earns its place in the model.

12

Form & Goals

Last-5 and last-10 average goals scored, conceded, and goal differentials — for both home and away contexts

06

Win Rates

Home, away, and overall win rates plus draw rates over the prior 10 matches

04

Elo Strength

Pre-match Elo ratings and Elo differential — capturing strength asymmetry between sides

02

Rest Days

Days of recovery since each team’s last competitive fixture

14

Player Aggregates

Minutes, goals, assists, cards, starters, used players, injuries, suspensions over prior 5 matches

06

Tactic & Coach IDs

Tactic identifier, coach identifier, and tactic-stability indicators per side

02

Team IDs

Stable identifiers for each side, enabling team-specific embeddings and patterns

02

Matchup Codes

Tactic-matchup composite codes capturing how specific tactical pairings historically resolve

section

From Install to Prediction in Five Lines

No API keys. No paywall. No registration. Open-source, MIT licensed, ready to fork.

section

What the Model Returns

section

Most agencies sell you a service. We sell you an outcome — then we don’t sleep until we deliver it.

We are not a body shop. We are not a feature factory. When we ship ML, we ship the model card, the evaluation summary, the SHA256 artifacts, and the responsible-use boundaries. Engineering integrity is not optional.

section

Transaction history · payment patterns · demographic signals · macro indicators · alternative data

Lower default rates while expanding approval coverage. Better risk-adjusted returns.

Clinical signals · lab trajectories · vital trends · intervention history · medication adherence

Earlier intervention. Better patient outcomes. Optimized resource allocation across care teams.

SKU sales velocity · price elasticity · seasonal patterns · promo calendar · external signals

Reduced stockouts. Lower carrying costs. Higher fulfillment rates and margin.

Engagement signals · feature-usage trajectories · support interaction patterns · billing history

Targeted retention spend. Higher net revenue retention. Faster CAC payback.

Historical traffic · driver patterns · weather signals · vehicle telemetry · route geometry

Improved on-time delivery. Lower fuel costs. Higher customer satisfaction scores.

Engagement signals · assessment trajectories · content consumption · interaction patterns

Higher completion rates. Lower dropout. Personalized learning paths at scale.

section

How AddWeb ML Engagements Work

Six phases. Each with defined deliverables, sign-off gates, and clear go/no-go decisions. No black boxes, no perpetual scope creep.

Week 1-2

01

Discovery & Data Audit

Feasibility assessment, data readiness review, problem framing. Output: a calibrated go/no-go recommendation. If ML isn’t the right tool, we tell you.

Week 2-4

02

Feature Engineering

Design the signal architecture. Build the feature builder. Establish baseline performance. This is where 80% of model quality is determined.

Week 4-8

03

Model Training & Calibration

Train candidate models. Apply temperature scaling. Validate on held-out data. Engineer abstain logic. Document evaluation summary with calibrated metrics.

Week 8-10

04

Deployment Integration

Plug into your stack — REST API, batch pipeline, or embedded inference. Instrument tracking. Set up monitoring. Production-ready hand-off.

Ongoing

05

Monitoring & Drift Detection

Track real-world accuracy. Detect concept drift. Schedule retraining. Maintain model card. The work isn’t done at deployment — it’s done when the model still works two years in.

Continuous

06

Knowledge Transfer

Documentation, runbooks, training data pipelines, model card, evaluation summary. Your team can maintain this. We make leaving easy — that’s why nobody does.

section

ML Discovery Sprint

2-week fixed-scope feasibility audit. Best for teams unsure whether ML is the right tool — or which prediction problem to solve first.


2 weeks · fixed price

ML Practice Embed

Monthly retainer. Senior ML engineers embedded with your team. Ideal for businesses building ML as a core capability across multiple use cases.


Monthly · 3-month minimum

Factor
AddWeb ML Practice
Build In-House Team
AutoML Platforms
Time to first calibrated model
✓ 8-16 weeks
6-12 months (hiring + ramp)
2-4 weeks (uncalibrated)
Industry-specific feature engineering
✓ Deep, custom
~ Depends on hire
✗ Generic only
Production deployment experience
✓ 4+ years
~ Variable
✗ Platform-locked
Calibration & abstain logic rigor
✓ Standard practice
~ Often skipped
✗ Rarely available
Open-source proof points
✓ HF + Kaggle
✗ N/A
✗ Closed platform
Monitoring & drift detection
✓ Built in
~ Manual setup
~ Platform-tier dependent
Cost (typical)
✓ $40K-$150K project
$300K+/year team
$50K-$500K/year licensing
You own the IP
✓ Full transfer
✓ Yes
✗ Platform vendor lock-in
Long-term maintenance
✓ Optional retainer
~ Ongoing team cost
~ Subscription required
section

How We Make ML Engagements Low-Risk

ML projects fail more often than they succeed. We’ve engineered five concrete safeguards to flip those odds.

01

Discovery Sprint Truth

If our 2-week Discovery determines ML isn’t the right tool, we tell you. You pay only for the Discovery — never for the wrong build.

02

NDA-First Engagement

Mutual NDA before any data review. Every engineer signs an individual NDA. ISO 27001 certified for information security.

03

Calibrated Honesty

We share confidence intervals on our own delivery estimates. No vendor over-promising. We tell you the realistic accuracy ceiling before training begins.

04

Full IP & Model Transfer

Source code · trained models · training pipelines · model card · eval summary · runbooks. All yours on completion. No retention.

05

No Lock-In Exit

Documentation complete enough that another team could maintain it. We make leaving easy — that’s why nobody does.

section

This Is One Model. We Run an AI Practice.

Three owned AI products. Four years of production AI work. The La Liga Score Predictor is a sample — not the ceiling.

Beyond what’s open-sourced, AddWeb operates a full AI Solutions practice covering Generative AI & LLM development, AI Agents & Automation, Custom ML, AI for eCommerce, AI Voice Agents, and Computer Vision. Three of our AI products are in production today:

AddWeb AI

Customizable AI Platform for Business Workflows

EcomSupport360

AI-Powered eCommerce Automation

WeWP

AI-Driven WordPress Hosting

section

section
section

The 27-Point ML Project Audit Checklist

Before you commit budget to a custom ML project, audit your readiness across 27 critical factors — data quality, problem framing, deployment fit, ROI viability, team capability. Used by senior CTOs to de-risk ML investments.

section

section

Three Ways to Start. Pick Your Commitment Level.

From a 30-minute Discovery Call to a free audit checklist, every entry point is designed to give you something useful before you commit a dollar.

We respond within 4 business hours · NDA available on request · ISO 27001 certified

section

chat-board-icon

pooja

chat-bot
What can I help you with today?

Need to Hire a WordPress Developer?

Looking for Drupal Experts?

Need React or Laravel Help?

chat-bot-icon
Hello! How can I help you?
send-msg
Disclaimer: AI-generated replies may be inaccurate.